freckledtrash:

Disney’s The Jungle Book cast so far: Neel Sethi as Mowgli, Ben Kingsley as the voice of Bagheera, Lupita Nyong’o as the voice of Rakcha, Scarlett Johansson as the voice of Kaa and Idris Elba as the voice of Shere Khan (x x x x)

YO, THIS IS A REAL THING THAT IS HAPPENING

And not only is the cast amazing, but the film is going to be a mixture of live-action and animation (a-la Mary Poppins). Neel Seth (Mowgli),is going to be the only live-action actor and everyone else’s characters will be animated AND I COULD NOT BE MORE EXCITED.

2 days ago with 64479 notes  - via / source
TAGGED AS: the jungle book;  disney;  




saccharinescorpion:

my major problem with Frozen is that it is a perfectly passable and average and safe Disney movie and people keep trying to prove that it is amazing and daring and challenging and in doing so keep churning out bombs of secondhand embarrassment like “look there’s some not-white people in the background, we’ve come so far since the 1950s” and “Anna isn’t your typical perfect Disney beauty, she has freckles and eyebrows that are .5% thicker than Rapunzel’s”

4 days ago with 23809 notes  - via / source
TAGGED AS: YEAH;  frozen;  disney;  srsly;  




6 days ago with 48440 notes  - via / source
TAGGED AS: disney;  big hero 6;  




talkdowntowhitepeople:

nailed it

1 week ago with 224153 notes  - via / source
TAGGED AS: lilo and stitch;  disney;  




kingkurlz:

showing off bae like 

1 week ago with 6651 notes  - via / source




steveholtvstheuniverse:

lmao like the only time i EVER see hard disney fans even mention ghibli and miyazaki in comparison to disney films is in light of disney’s own mistakes and laziness like damn y’all need to calm down

lemme teach you a lil’ somethin’ somethin’ about stylistic choices in animation and sheer laziness

STYLISTIC choices is about having the full capability of creating characters separate from the previous protagonists while at the same time tying them to the studio that produced them.

And that’s not even scratching the surface.

Considering that a good portion of Ghibli’s library consists of LEAD FEMALE PROTAGONISTS who are usually very young, they need to find a set balance between recognizable and unique.

Ghibli was founded on traditional art and the studio still holds many of those values with it. This is of course including hand-drawn animation in which there is no single model, only the same character drawn over and over again. Is this about CGI vs traditional? No, both can and have provided beautiful films and scenes but it’s not about which one deserves more recognition. It’s about the methods used and how the choices for each one vary. I only bring up the animation methods because it’s part of the reason as to WHY these characters are so simplistic in design.

Still though, they need each lead character to stick to the Ghibli/Miyazaki style to a certain extent. They need to share certain qualities to make them fall in line with the rest of Ghibli’s library.

I mean, they have their differences but they’re obviously Ghibli characters so okay they all have relatively small eyebrows (though considering that they are Japanese that ties in with their ethnicity but OKAY moving on), they all have the eye highlight thing going on, and they all have very non-pronounced noses. I suppose yeah those are all the same. They do shift but those characteristics are roughly the same.

Still though, that isn’t a problem nor is it blatant same-facing. All LAIKA characters have skewed noses, all Dreamworks characters have thin noses, and all Aardman characters have bulgy eyes. Does that mean they’re same-facing? No. It means they’re sticking to stylistic choices to keep themselves separate from the competition.

Don Bluth MADE the choice to stick to a style closely resembling Disney. You know what happened? A whole generation grew up thinking that Anastasia and Thumbelina were both DISNEY films, not Bluth and Fox animation.

There’s a reason why studios tend to go for their own set style.

But hey! Want even more evidence that it’s a stylistic choice?

Because THE VERY SAME CHOICES CAN BE SAID FOR THE DUDES

Save for Haku because he’s a fuckin’ dragon.

While gender is never really brought up in Ghibli films, masculinity and femininity are both neutral here, it’s safe to say that their designs and treatment are both equal. Ghibli isn’t out to make exclusively beautiful/handsome characters, they make them as simple as possible to keep them relatable and much more easier to manage.

The difference here is that Disney has always set out to make their MALES different while sticking their females to the same “doe eyed, small nose, thin lips” ideal. Yes, there is a set Disney style and it has always focused on those features and that necessarily isn’t a bad thing. It’s the Disney style. HOWEVER it seems to only apply to their females. Even worse is their marketing of said females.

GOTTA KEEP THEM GURLS PURTY

The Disney style has shifted from time to time and it shows evidence that it CAN include more diverse female designs. Both Kida and Calhoun are wonderful examples of this. It’s not as if Disney hasn’t evolved or changed their views on female characters to a certain extent. Unfortunately, said shifts haven’t always worked out in our favor or headed in the right direction. It wasn’t until Tangled that Disney came out with it’s true “get richer quicker” scheme with their female leads.

watch as i shift into MAXIMUM PUNZEL-DRIVE

As of late it’s Disney’s sheer laziness when it comes to female design and their own avarice that has caused SUUUUCH a dramatic shift in how fans are taking the Disney style now. When Ghibli audiences and fans never look at a new movie and go “oh it’s Chihiro but tiny” or “oh it’s Chihiro but on a broom.” That is the set style, not a lazy copy-paste.

But hey, let’s bring in OTHER females to see how this works out. I mean, the Ghibli style is prevalent to ALL of their characters so surely they all the parents look exactly like their children.

Let’s look at these lovely lady leads and compare them to their parents.

Congrats, kids, you’re all adopted!

WEIRDLY ENOUGH all of the characters and their parents (if they have any) share same characteristics while at the same time remaining completely unique to each other. It’s almost as if they also take after their father and/or previous generations of their familly. Haha, genetics!

But okay, let’s be a little more fair with Disney.

Let’s look at two families with two daughters.

Mitosis or go home

There is having stylistic choices and there is being lazy.

There is creating a character with similarities to their parent and there is making a recolor of your lead character.

There is creating simple designs for a traditionally animated film and there is reusing the same model because it worked so well the first time.

There is being a small Tokyo-based studio with 300 employees and there is being a large American animation studio with 800+ employees.

THAT is why no one ever complains about Ghibli’s approach to character design and THAT is why Disney doesn’t even come close to Miyazaki.

Let’s finish this off with some MORE wonderful Ghibli characters (most of which being my personal favorites so they belong on here too.)

Now go watch more Ghibli.

3 weeks ago with 88654 notes  - via / source




nicoosuxx:

Omfg

3 weeks ago with 138275 notes  - via / source
TAGGED AS: lmao what;  the little mermaid;  disney;  




shrineart:

ughsocialjustice:

rustlingpages:

Hey guys, guess what?

THIS IS FAKE!!

SOURCE: http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=53763

DISNEY INFORMED CBR NEWS THAT THEY WERE FAKE AND SO HAVE BEEN REMOVED!

Can we stop bitching about a movie that hasn’t come out yet please

*casually waits for them to be confirmed a few months from now like the Frozen ones were*

3 weeks ago with 1444 notes  - via / source




doodlesanddiscord:

socialjusticekars:

noworriesjustbehappy:

bechnokid:

8oo:

So its pretty impossible to find the exact same angle in a screenshot but I just wanted try it out of curiosity. As soon as I overlapped them the nose and face-shape (chin and jaw) fit like a glove. Since Honey Lemon is squinting her eyes end a bit higher but other than that its pretty much the same model.

HOLY MOLY„„„„,this is a lot to take in„„

#NOT AGAIN

Truer words were never said.

oh here we go, now after this movie comes out 6 months of this + frozen + Tangled.

Shut up already, Animation tents to look similar from movie to movie when from the same studio.

can we all stop making excuses for a multi-billion dollar corporation that is literally supposed to specialize in animation and storytelling, and yet it hasn’t been able to create a female character with an individual appearance for literally 4 years, over the span of three movies? please? can we stop babying a company full of talented, wealthy adults into complacency over their own lack of skill? this is lack of skill and shouldn’t be treated as anything but lack of skill. this is amateurism. this is not multi-billion dollar animation quality. this is laziness, and it’s unacceptable.

Shut up already, Animation tents to look similar from movie to movie when from the same studio.”

Is

That

Really

Your

Best

Argument?

Just look at the noses on each of these characters. Every single one is different. Look at the different jaw lines. The different eye shapes. The different head shapes.

Now look back at Rapunzel next to Honey Lemon. They literally have identical features. They didn’t even change the color of her eyes. Disney could not have been more lazy.

3 weeks ago with 17276 notes  - via / source




everyone: why do you keep making female characters that look like rapunzel
disney:
disney:
disney: i came out tonight to have a good time and i honestly am feeling so attacked right now
3 weeks ago with 1994 notes  - via / source
TAGGED AS: disney;  LMAOOOOO;  




© JASON
DILAURENTS